Skip to content

Baseline metrics ​

These metrics become the baseline that later assessments compare against. They are recorded, not scored: they tell you whether the scores are matched by what actually happens.

MetricWhy it matters
Lead time, request to productionThe end-to-end result, not a stage
Review pickup timeHow long a change waits for its first human look
Human approvals and wait per PRWhether human attention is being spent or queued
Share of merges with zero review, by tierWhere the safety net is thin
Change failure and revert rateQuality of what ships
Incidents per 100 merged changesWhether speed is creating production risk
CI queue time and flake ratePlatform fit for agent volume
Time to roll backCost of being wrong
Changes linked to acceptance criteriaSpecification discipline
Backlog trendWhether extra output is absorbed or piling up

Every metric here is better when lower, apart from links to acceptance criteria. Pick one for the prediction in your decision record.

Reported reference points ​

From vendor reports, so best treated as directional. Each vendor sells measurement tools, so each has a reason to find a problem worth measuring.

  • Review waits. LinearB's 2026 benchmarks (8.1 million pull requests from 4,800 teams) report agentic pull requests waiting 5.3 times longer for pickup than unassisted ones, and AI-generated pull requests accepted 32.7% of the time against 84.4% for manual ones.
  • Unreviewed merges. Faros AI's 2026 report (22,000 developers, comparing each organization's lowest and highest AI adoption periods) reports pull requests merged without any review up 31.3% and the incidents-to-PR ratio up 242.7%.
  • More output, longer queues. DX's Q3 2026 report (500+ companies) shows weekly pull requests per developer up 75.5% over four quarters, and a 105% longer wait for first review at the organizations producing the most AI code.

How each figure was checked is on the evidence page.

Goodhart's warning ​

When a measure becomes a target it stops measuring well. Report these metrics together, never one alone, and never treat pull-request counts or the share of AI-written code as success.